[wordads]

Denis Musanje

On the graduation of the 2025/2026 Uganda Premier League season, the Federation of Uganda Soccer Associations (FUFA) undertook what seemed to be a commendable initiative geared toward enhancing refereeing requirements and strengthening efficiency monitoring. In pursuit of this goal, referees’ assessors successfully the “coaches” of match officers have been subjected to competency analysis checks to find out their readiness to raise officiating requirements.

Assessors play a task as crucial to referees as coaches do to gamers. Their analytical perception, objectivity, and skill to speak constructive suggestions are important in shaping refereeing efficiency. With out competent assessors, even essentially the most promising referees threat stagnation.

The assessments, performed on the FUFA Cranes Paradise Lodge in Kisasi, consisted of technical and analytical examinations generally known as “trivia checks.” These concerned video-based match eventualities drawn from televised FUFA competitions such because the Uganda Premier League and the FUFA Massive League. Assessors have been required to judge incidents figuring out, for example, whether or not a problem warranted a yellow or crimson card, or whether or not an offside offense had occurred whereas offering exact justification for his or her selections. In essence, the checks measured match interpretation, decision-making accuracy, and analytical reasoning.

Nonetheless, the outcomes painted a troubling image.

Dependable sources inside the federation point out that the preliminary move mark was set at 10 out of 20. Beneath this commonplace, solely two assessors Denis Batte and Catherine Nagadya efficiently met the edge. In response, the move mark was subsequently lowered to eight out of 20. But even with this adjustment, efficiency remained largely underwhelming, with solely 4 assessors managing to attain 9 out of 20.

The general rating distribution was as follows:

11 marks: 1 assessor
10 marks: 1 assessor
9 marks: 4 assessors
8 marks: 2 assessors
7 marks: 5 assessors
6 marks: 4 assessors
5 marks: 1 assessor
4 marks: 3 assessors
3 marks: 5 assessors
2 marks: 1 assessor
1 mark: 1 assessor

A major majority scored beneath even the adjusted move mark, elevating severe issues in regards to the competence of these entrusted with guiding referees.

One may moderately anticipate that those that carried out finest in these evaluations can be prioritized for high-stakes matches, significantly through the decisive phases of the season when refereeing errors have a tendency to extend. Satirically and maybe predictably the alternative seems to be the case. Assessors with decrease scores have reportedly been assigned to essentially the most crucial fixtures.

A number of explanations have emerged. One justification cited is the necessity for regional illustration, guaranteeing that every match options an assessor from a selected locality. One other, extra contentious rationale, is the notion amongst decision-makers that former referees who didn’t attain FIFA standing are inherently much less certified to function assessors. This notion, nonetheless, is essentially flawed. Officiating on the FIFA degree and assessing referees are distinct disciplines; the latter calls for sturdy analytical capacity, efficient communication (significantly in English), and a deep understanding of the trendy recreation.

Extra regarding nonetheless are experiences that some assessors didn’t sit for the competency checks in any respect. Allegedly, their absence was attributable to involvement in political mobilization actions for a distinguished Member of Parliament with important affect in soccer circles. In what seems to be a troubling substitution of meritocracy with loyalty, such people are nonetheless thought of for evaluation roles.

The irony is tough to disregard whereas referees proceed to face criticism for inconsistent performances in Uganda’s prime competitions, the very people tasked with mentoring and evaluating them could themselves lack the mandatory competence or worse, bypass the system completely.

The analysis train was coordinated by Referees Supervisor Ssali Mashood and the FUFA Referees Standing Committee Chairman Brian Miiro Nsubuga, with examinations administered by Ali Tomusange Mulumba (a CAF Referees Committee member), David Davis Katabira, and Adipo Catherine.

If Ugandan soccer is to handle the persistent subject of refereeing errors, consideration should prolong past the referees themselves to these liable for their improvement. Till the requirements utilized to assessors match the expectations positioned on referees, the cycle of inconsistency could properly persist leaving the attractive recreation entangled in avoidable controversy.